<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constant Content&#8211;The Lamest, Least Researched Content Site Review Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/</link>
	<description>Your Freelance Writing Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14719</guid>
		<description>@Thursday, thanks for adding to the conversation. I see how that could be a viable strategy to salvage some earnings. I have a kill fee written into my freelance writing project contract, but that still leaves me with some article I&#039;ve got to put somewhere. 

@Jenn, CC definitely seems like a solid alternative to content mills and the like for earning what your time is worth. Like I said, as I&#039;m establishing my platform, building up my niche blog and trying to grow a client base, I could see writing articles for CC and / or responding for calls as a viable way to earn and potentially find clients during those early business stages.

@Celeste, I know you&#039;ve got a solid history with CC, but do you think that you might start directing people to work more directly with you? I&#039;m not sure if this would violate the CC TOC (which I wouldn&#039;t encourage) but maybe in general to get people to work directly with you. You still have those middlemen fees, you&#039;re not getting paid immediately (of course I don&#039;t know what your standard billing policies are) and an external site has market share on your revenue--it seems like it could be hazardous. No matter how great it seems, I don&#039;t think anyone could rely on a single external source to keep them afloat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thursday, thanks for adding to the conversation. I see how that could be a viable strategy to salvage some earnings. I have a kill fee written into my freelance writing project contract, but that still leaves me with some article I&#8217;ve got to put somewhere. </p>
<p>@Jenn, CC definitely seems like a solid alternative to content mills and the like for earning what your time is worth. Like I said, as I&#8217;m establishing my platform, building up my niche blog and trying to grow a client base, I could see writing articles for CC and / or responding for calls as a viable way to earn and potentially find clients during those early business stages.</p>
<p>@Celeste, I know you&#8217;ve got a solid history with CC, but do you think that you might start directing people to work more directly with you? I&#8217;m not sure if this would violate the CC TOC (which I wouldn&#8217;t encourage) but maybe in general to get people to work directly with you. You still have those middlemen fees, you&#8217;re not getting paid immediately (of course I don&#8217;t know what your standard billing policies are) and an external site has market share on your revenue&#8211;it seems like it could be hazardous. No matter how great it seems, I don&#8217;t think anyone could rely on a single external source to keep them afloat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday Bram</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14717</link>
		<dc:creator>Thursday Bram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14717</guid>
		<description>I tend not to specifically respond to requests on Constant Content, although I&#039;ve making some money there. I tend to post projects where something has gone wrong — an article gets killed, that sort of thing. It&#039;s a strategy that pays off at least a little. 

I know I could probably do better if I spent time on selling those articles to private clients, but sometimes I just don&#039;t have time to devote to that sort of project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend not to specifically respond to requests on Constant Content, although I&#8217;ve making some money there. I tend to post projects where something has gone wrong — an article gets killed, that sort of thing. It&#8217;s a strategy that pays off at least a little. </p>
<p>I know I could probably do better if I spent time on selling those articles to private clients, but sometimes I just don&#8217;t have time to devote to that sort of project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste Stewart</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14687</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14687</guid>
		<description>I suppose I speak of volume in this way because most of my long term clients and the ones that provide me with tons of work happen to be those I work with via Constant-Content. I&#039;ve been doing Constant-Content since 2006 but only recently launched my own site so I&#039;ve yet to experience large volumes of work from my own marketing efforts. I&#039;ve found that building a Web site, getting it in front of potential customers, and landing projects is time consuming - and that&#039;s before I write a single word! With CC, I spend more time writing/earning and less time looking for work.  

Beside pricing really does vary by the client, the project&#039;s scope, and other factors regardless of where the client came from.  

In addition, clients using CC receive some value from the middle man. All articles go through an editorial review and plagiarism check before customers ever see them and the site offers a money back guarantee. Sure, clients can run their own CopyScape checks, but some don&#039;t want to deal with stuff like that.

To give you an idea of the volume that I do on CC, that 2500 articles sold number mentioned in my first post isn&#039;t really accurate. Most of my projects are submitted to client in batches of anywhere from ten to thirty to hundreds of articles at a time. So a single sale on CC is often for multiple articles. Many of those sales are for complete training manuals, white papers, and other large projects. So, yeah, I do a huge volume there.

Anyhow, the CC concept isn&#039;t for everyone and I&#039;m one of the exceptions rather than the norm, but it&#039;s worked nicely for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I speak of volume in this way because most of my long term clients and the ones that provide me with tons of work happen to be those I work with via Constant-Content. I&#8217;ve been doing Constant-Content since 2006 but only recently launched my own site so I&#8217;ve yet to experience large volumes of work from my own marketing efforts. I&#8217;ve found that building a Web site, getting it in front of potential customers, and landing projects is time consuming &#8211; and that&#8217;s before I write a single word! With CC, I spend more time writing/earning and less time looking for work.  </p>
<p>Beside pricing really does vary by the client, the project&#8217;s scope, and other factors regardless of where the client came from.  </p>
<p>In addition, clients using CC receive some value from the middle man. All articles go through an editorial review and plagiarism check before customers ever see them and the site offers a money back guarantee. Sure, clients can run their own CopyScape checks, but some don&#8217;t want to deal with stuff like that.</p>
<p>To give you an idea of the volume that I do on CC, that 2500 articles sold number mentioned in my first post isn&#8217;t really accurate. Most of my projects are submitted to client in batches of anywhere from ten to thirty to hundreds of articles at a time. So a single sale on CC is often for multiple articles. Many of those sales are for complete training manuals, white papers, and other large projects. So, yeah, I do a huge volume there.</p>
<p>Anyhow, the CC concept isn&#8217;t for everyone and I&#8217;m one of the exceptions rather than the norm, but it&#8217;s worked nicely for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Mattern</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Mattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14686</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t do any of those things either though for private clients (advertise, spend a lot of time on invoicing -- takes less than a minute, tracking down payments, etc.). So I&#039;m not sure how much of a benefit those specific factors are. I personally wouldn&#039;t consider them anywhere near worth 35% of my fees, but that&#039;s just me. 

Can you explain more about what you mean by &quot;volume&quot; when talking about buyer benefits? You can sell in volume to private clients just as easily, and they&#039;d still be paying less per piece, so again I don&#039;t see any benefit other than not wanting to worry about your own site (which you do anyway). I might be misunderstanding what you mean by volume here though, so feel free to enlighten me. It&#039;s always good to know the logic behind the different ways writers choose to operate. And even though it&#039;s not my cup of tea, it might benefit someone else to better understand it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t do any of those things either though for private clients (advertise, spend a lot of time on invoicing &#8212; takes less than a minute, tracking down payments, etc.). So I&#8217;m not sure how much of a benefit those specific factors are. I personally wouldn&#8217;t consider them anywhere near worth 35% of my fees, but that&#8217;s just me. </p>
<p>Can you explain more about what you mean by &#8220;volume&#8221; when talking about buyer benefits? You can sell in volume to private clients just as easily, and they&#8217;d still be paying less per piece, so again I don&#8217;t see any benefit other than not wanting to worry about your own site (which you do anyway). I might be misunderstanding what you mean by volume here though, so feel free to enlighten me. It&#8217;s always good to know the logic behind the different ways writers choose to operate. And even though it&#8217;s not my cup of tea, it might benefit someone else to better understand it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste Stewart</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14685</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14685</guid>
		<description>My Constant-Content.com clients are getting fair rates despite the CC markup due to the volume; most are getting a better rate than I charge non-CC customers. For one thing, there&#039;s the volume as I mentioned. For another, I don&#039;t have to bother with invoicing and tracking down payments. Another, I don&#039;t have to advertise to attract clients. It&#039;s all good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Constant-Content.com clients are getting fair rates despite the CC markup due to the volume; most are getting a better rate than I charge non-CC customers. For one thing, there&#8217;s the volume as I mentioned. For another, I don&#8217;t have to bother with invoicing and tracking down payments. Another, I don&#8217;t have to advertise to attract clients. It&#8217;s all good :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHaynesWriter</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14683</link>
		<dc:creator>JHaynesWriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14683</guid>
		<description>Celeste,
Thanks so much for sharing. As I work on building my platform I will look to Constant Content for some of my income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celeste,<br />
Thanks so much for sharing. As I work on building my platform I will look to Constant Content for some of my income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Mattern</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14682</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Mattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14682</guid>
		<description>From what Celeste is saying, CC can pretty much operate the same way private clients do (that&#039;s really what it amounts to) as long as you account for their fees. And that makes sense. The only potential downside I can see is that charging more to CC clients than you would to direct private clients for the same end earnings could cut down on the overall client base due to the middleman payments. That said, for those who don&#039;t want to bother marketing their own sites much, the visibility of a built-in service site sounds like a viable alternative. It absolutely sounds like a better option than fixed rate or residual payment content mills, and allows the writers to maintain a certain level of professionalism in charging what their time and content is really worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what Celeste is saying, CC can pretty much operate the same way private clients do (that&#8217;s really what it amounts to) as long as you account for their fees. And that makes sense. The only potential downside I can see is that charging more to CC clients than you would to direct private clients for the same end earnings could cut down on the overall client base due to the middleman payments. That said, for those who don&#8217;t want to bother marketing their own sites much, the visibility of a built-in service site sounds like a viable alternative. It absolutely sounds like a better option than fixed rate or residual payment content mills, and allows the writers to maintain a certain level of professionalism in charging what their time and content is really worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yo</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14680</link>
		<dc:creator>Yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14680</guid>
		<description>Thanks for weighing in Celeste. As I mentioned in the article, I did not have enough time to really play around with CC. Your insight is extremely helpful :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for weighing in Celeste. As I mentioned in the article, I did not have enough time to really play around with CC. Your insight is extremely helpful :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste Stewart</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14679</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14679</guid>
		<description>JHaynes,
I make a full time income writing for Constant-Content.com. Several clients keep me busy with private requests and I also submit articles on general topics when the mood strikes. I do also have clients outside of Constant-Content. I&#039;d say 75% of my work is from CC and 25% is from clients who have found me via my Web site or from referrals.

Yes, I adjust my prices with the 35% cut in mind. For example, if an article takes me an hour to write and I want to make $65 for my efforts, then I charge $100. I always consider how much I need to earn for the time spent as well as the client&#039;s budget. From there, I mark my price up accordingly. That way, I get what I want, CC gets its fee, and the client receives an article that meets his needs. It&#039;s win-win-win. Plus, by separating my fee and CC&#039;s percentage, there&#039;s no resentment that CC&#039;s taking so much of &quot;my&quot; money. That&#039;s because I never think of that portion of mine to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHaynes,<br />
I make a full time income writing for Constant-Content.com. Several clients keep me busy with private requests and I also submit articles on general topics when the mood strikes. I do also have clients outside of Constant-Content. I&#8217;d say 75% of my work is from CC and 25% is from clients who have found me via my Web site or from referrals.</p>
<p>Yes, I adjust my prices with the 35% cut in mind. For example, if an article takes me an hour to write and I want to make $65 for my efforts, then I charge $100. I always consider how much I need to earn for the time spent as well as the client&#8217;s budget. From there, I mark my price up accordingly. That way, I get what I want, CC gets its fee, and the client receives an article that meets his needs. It&#8217;s win-win-win. Plus, by separating my fee and CC&#8217;s percentage, there&#8217;s no resentment that CC&#8217;s taking so much of &#8220;my&#8221; money. That&#8217;s because I never think of that portion of mine to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHaynesWriter</title>
		<link>http://allfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/05/freelancing/general/the-lamest-least-researched-content-site-review-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-14678</link>
		<dc:creator>JHaynesWriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allfreelancewriting.com/?p=4191#comment-14678</guid>
		<description>Celeste, 
Having sold near 3,000 articles on Constant Content, I guess you would be qualified to shed some light on them. 

Can I ask you how you utilize the income from them? Do you use it as another income stream to stave off in-between client feast / famine stretches, or is Constant Content a bigger part of your business strategy?

Also, how do you account for the commission--do you simply increase your rate by 35%?

Thanks for stopping by. I would like to hear more about CC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celeste,<br />
Having sold near 3,000 articles on Constant Content, I guess you would be qualified to shed some light on them. </p>
<p>Can I ask you how you utilize the income from them? Do you use it as another income stream to stave off in-between client feast / famine stretches, or is Constant Content a bigger part of your business strategy?</p>
<p>Also, how do you account for the commission&#8211;do you simply increase your rate by 35%?</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by. I would like to hear more about CC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

